Hotels & Stays

Inside the Rise of Bloom, a Tech-Led Hotel Platform in India

Inside the Rise of Bloom, a Tech-Led Hotel Platform in India

This sponsored content was created in collaboration with a Skift partner.

Scale has long been the dominant metric of success for hotel brands, with operators prioritizing footprint as a proxy for strength. Technology, in most cases, has remained largely in the background, supporting day-to-day operations rather than shaping the core business model.

Bloom Hotels took a different approach. Fifteen years ago, when most hotel brands were still treating technology as a back-end function, Bloom began developing tools to manage housekeeping, pricing, and property performance before the brand itself took shape. Those systems now define how the company operates, scales, and maintains consistency across properties.

Over the past 15 years, Bloom has grown within one of the world’s most complex hospitality markets, where maintaining standards at scale is notoriously difficult. Its model relies on proprietary systems to maintain consistency across properties as it expands. After years of controlled growth, Bloom is entering a more aggressive expansion phase. The question now is whether a tech-led approach can sustain rapid expansion without compromising product consistency in India and beyond.

SkiftX spoke with Tom Welbury, chief product officer of Bloom Hotels, to explore how that model was built, why it required a longer timeline, and what comes next.

Tom Welbury, chief product officer, Bloom Hotels

SkiftX: You describe Bloom as a tech-first hospitality company. Many hotel brands make similar claims — so where does that show up in practice at the operating level, and how does Bloom’s approach differ? 

Tom Welbury: In the early days, our initial team had only one employee with hotel experience — we were primarily tech and product people. Our roots have always been in tech, solving a real-world hardware problem: hotels. Many platforms describe themselves as tech-led, but in practice, they focus on booking and revenue tools layered onto franchising models and heavy discounting, which haven’t consistently worked in India.

At Bloom, we built everything with a tech-first approach, from identifying the right locations and upcycling obsolete buildings to running operations at scale and implementing predictive pricing. We cover the entire stack. A lot of our tech isn’t visible to guests and runs the hotel unit behind the scenes, creating product consistency while optimizing costs.    

Where does technology create the most measurable impact in the business today?

Our tech is foundational rather than specific to a business area. When we started, the company didn’t onboard a single hotel onto the platform for an entire year. Instead, we used that time to build out version 1.0 of the tech that you see running Bloom Hotels today. This patience paid off, and the tech has been able to learn from the first hotel onwards, continually improving across all areas. As a result, we’ve been able to deliver a consistently strong user experience at scale, greater capital efficiency, and higher profits.

Why have you chosen to keep the technology in-house rather than offering it as a SaaS product to other hotel operators, as some competitors have done?

We decided early on that our tech would be most effective when fully integrated into our own hardware, which, in this case, is the physical hotel product. There have been repeated offers to license our tech, and while this would be an interesting vertical to explore, there are no immediate plans to offer a SaaS product to other hotels. We may, however, be open to this option once the platform has over 10,000 rooms in the near future.

Bloom has not expanded at the pace seen in some other markets. What trade-offs did you make between scaling quickly and maintaining control?

We made a conscious decision to first establish strong product-market fit, iterate on our tech, and achieve profitability before blitzscaling. Initially, it was hard to resist the temptation to grow ahead of plan, especially after several later entrants raised substantial capital. We risked ceding first-mover advantage and early users, but we realized it wouldn’t work without getting the tech and other factors in place, so we stuck to our initial plan.

It was counterintuitive at the time, but we felt it was important to get product and profit right before scaling up. Difficult as it was, we believe this has been the right decision: Get the product right, then scale — not the other way around.

What has changed to make this the right moment to scale more aggressively — and what gives you confidence the model will hold at that pace?

We’ve spent a lot of time understanding how to build scale with product consistency, and we believe we’re now equipped to do so across all Indian micro markets. We’re extremely bullish on the India opportunity and see a strong opportunity across tier two and three cities, as well as in religious travel, for this larger rollout.

In planning the blueprint for a scale-up, we visited China, where we met the founders of some of the largest travel tech and budget hotel brands. One of them, who scaled to over 1,000 hotels in just a few years, now sits on our board. With his guidance, we’ve set a clear roadmap to achieve a similar scale in India. 

At the same time, we’ve learned from other brands that demonstrate a China-type 100,000-room platform in India is achievable. The difference is that we aim to get there while sustaining product and profitability, advancing with greater discipline along the growth curve to 100,000 rooms. Headline scale alone isn’t sustainable in a complex market like India.  

How are you thinking about entering new markets, and what conditions need to be in place for expansion to work at scale?

The India outbound opportunity has grown significantly, and we currently have several offers in Asia and Europe to expand. That said, we want to enter new markets in a deliberate manner with the right international partners rather than just opening a few hotels without proper scale. For now, there’s still tremendous untapped opportunity in India, including smaller towns and leisure destinations that require our focus, so we’ll continue to prioritize our India scale-up while remaining open to discussions with potential international partners.

How transferable is Bloom’s model beyond India? What elements are specific to this market, and what could realistically be applied in other regions?

We’re confident we can win against global players in international markets, as we’ve already demonstrated in India. Internationally, we may adjust our product to ensure we maintain the same level of product-market fit, but fundamentally, the Bloom tech stack is region-agnostic and will deliver the same high-impact value as we expand our platform abroad. 

How has Bloom Hotels approached balancing growth with profitability in a capital-intensive industry?

We’ve grown revenues at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) exceeding 45% over the last three years while maintaining product quality and profitability at both the unit and company levels. While we’re sometimes advised to push growth even higher, we’ll only do so if we’re confident that profitability will match or exceed this growth.

Too many revenue-linked growth plans are based on assumptions about future profitability that rarely materialize. At Bloom, we believe growth and profit need not be mutually exclusive. By further applying capital efficiency to this approach, we have also delivered a return on capital employed above 30% and plan to sustain this in the next phase of growth. 

How are you thinking about capital, and what role might an IPO play in Bloom’s long-term strategy?

We plan to IPO at the right time, but nothing is set in stone. Of course, to sustain growth towards 100,000 rooms as part of the long-term plan, we will require capital to roll out across all Indian markets. For this, we will have to consider capital infusion either directly or through an IPO.

For the immediate plan of 10,000 to 15,000 rooms, we’ve been more focused on identifying quality capital that adds value rather than plain-vanilla equity. There’s a lot of that around, but for us, the right partner adds significant value over and above the capital that’s brought in. An IPO remains an option, but we may consider other forms of capital before that. No plans are finalized yet, and the decision will come down to balancing dilution with finding the right long-term fit for the business.

To find out more about Bloom Hotels, visit staybloom.com

This content was created collaboratively by Bloom Hotels and Skift’s branded content studio, SkiftX.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *